Sunday, April 3, 2011

Discussion 14 : Trade on the Gambling Table!

Great day ahead!

Due to recent feedbacks that I've gotten from my readers who repeatedly question the success of technical trading, I consider myself to have an obligation to share this discussion with all my readers.

Before we begin, I apologize if I ever hinted a guaranteed success trading with Technical Analysis (TA). TA, in no way, guarantees absolute profitability to its practitioners. TA's role is merely to enhance the probabilities of you guessing the right market direction.

Therefore, TA alone, is not sufficient in making you a successful trader.


THEN WHAT MAKES A SUCCESSFUL TRADER?
When I ask most average traders whether they realise that there are risks in trading, all of them would say "YES". But when the stock price fell, they hold onto their stocks, hoping that the prices would go up. From a trader, they suddenly became an investor! Obviously, they understand only the English Language of 'risk', but not the Financial Literacy of 'risk'.

The key to making yourself a successful technical trader is not so much on the extent of the Technical Analysis that you practise or what Technical Indicators you use, but very much dependent on the way you manage your risks with each trades, and the discipline to follow through your strategy, enduring losses as they happen!


MAKING A SENSIBLE TRADE
You give a million dollars of cash to an average gambler, and you see your money got wiped out in a few hours.

A professional gambler, on the other hand, is able to make a lot of money on the casino table, with just very little initial capital.

Being a trader is akin to being a gambler. Being an ignorant trader is equivalent of being an ignorant gambler who will get wiped out, regardless of how much money he brought along into the casino. A professional trader, would be able to make a fortune with very little initial capital.

A professional gambler makes money on the table due to a few factors:
  1. The probabilities of winning is higher than the probabilities of losing.
  2. The rewards of winning is higher than the costs of losing.
  3. The risks of his gambling capital to be wiped out after a streak of consecutive losses are low.

THE USE OF TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Professional gamblers are masters of probabilities. They are aware of their odds of winning and losing and are able to brilliantly keep up with their odds on the trading table after each cards are dealt from the deck. When the odds of winning is with the gambler, he may either raise or call, but when things turn bad, he would know when to fold the hand, taking the loss of the initial 'table money'.

Same goes to trading. As a trade turns bad, traders cut their losses (fold). When the trade goes in their favour, they may consider buying/shorting more (raise), or wait and let the profits run (call). TA is an indicator of probabilites that would help a trader to keep track of their odds in the environment of the market (trading table) after each trading period (cards dealt from deck).

Since TA enhances the probability of winning, it is undeniably a good component to include in devising your trading strategy. You need not win each and every of your trades, but if you are able to minimize your losses (cut losses) and letting your profits run when it happens, and the probability of you making profits is higher than the probability of you making losses, you are doing fine.

Think. Why gamble when the odds are not with you (going against the trend)? Will you even consider gambling when you are unaware of your odds of winning (trade without TA)?


RISK AND REWARD RATIO (RRR)
If I were to buy a stock at RM1.00, and am prepared to cut loss at RM0.80, with a profit target in mind of RM1.60, it can be translated (in terms of gambling) to "I am putting RM0.20 as a 'bet' for a winning reward of RM0.60". In other words, my RRR is RM0.20 : RM0.60, which is 1 : 3.

If I were to buy a stock at RM1.00, and am prepared to cut loss at RM0.80, with RM1.10 in mind as profit target, my RRR is RM0.20 : RM0.10, which is 1 : 0.5.

Which of the two trades above is a more sensible one? I believe the first one would be. It does not make sense if you traded for an expected gain of half the amount of the money you wagered on the 'bet'. No professional gamblers would gamble on such terms, unless the odds of winning is significantly higher than the odds of losing.

I always avoid involvements in trades that have RRRs that are lower than 1 : 2. To most traders, the RRR would have to be at least 1 : 3 before they find that the trade is sensible. Some traders might even accept a trading RRR of as low as 1 : 1.5! Determination of which RRRs are acceptable to you generally depends on how good and reliable the odds of winning are in your trading strategy.


RISK OF RUIN
The Risk of Ruin is a term that is often used in gambling. It is the risk of you losing a substantial amount of capital due to a streak of successive losses to render it unwise or unprofitable to continue gambling.

Since professional gambling is a business of odds, there are times when a gambler would experience a streak of consecutive losses. No matter how good a trading strategy is, as long as it is subjected to odds, he would not make money if he loses all of his capital before his streak of consecutive losses ends.

All traders face this problem. In the game of probabilities, you may lose all your earned money in a blink due to a streak of successive losses. That is why risk management is so crucial if you intend to be a successful technical trader. This problem is more apparent during the initial stages when traders just started off their trading careers. This is due to them having small portfolios and their inexperience in trading that make them more susceptible to successive losses that wipe them out before even making a penny of profit.


EXAMPLE OF RISK OF RUIN
Adapting an illustration from The Edge, I would use the FKLI contracts as an example. You opened an account with RM7,700, keeping in mind that margin required for FKLI is RM2,700, so your risk capital would be RM5,000 (RM7,700 - RM2,700). Assume that you trade 1 contract and stopping out after 2 points of losses (which is RM125, including commissions).

This way, you can afford to lose 40 consecutive trades before raising the white flag (liquidating your account). In the event that things work well, and let's say that you have managed to accumulate RM22,000 in your account, and you are now trading 3 contracts (assuming you raise a contract after every RM7,500), your losses would now be RM375 a trade.

You can then afford to lose 19 consecutive trades before reducing your account balance to RM14,875. This time, you reduce your trading contracts to 2 (RM250). Now, you can afford to make another 30 consecutive losing trades before your account balance reduces to RM7,375. You'll then lower your trading contracts to 1 (RM125) and can afford to lose another 38 consecutive trades before turning your account balance to RM2,625, which you will then declare your account as 'ruined'.

From here, we can see that to be ruined from RM22,000 to RM2,625, requires a consecutive loss of 87 (19 + 30 + 38) trades, giving you ample opportunities to remain in-play. The 'Risk of Ruin' concept is widely practised by Turtle Traders in managing their risks.

You may not be win while you remain in-play, but you lose once you've lost your ability to play.


CONCLUSION
Being a successful trader requires you to
  1. Maximize your probabilities of winning;
  2. Given the maximized probabilities of winning, make a sensible trade;
  3. While making a sensible trade, be aware of the Risk of Ruin; and
  4. The Discipline to go through tough times of consecutive losses.

Always remember, it is very often NOT the knowledge that makes you a successful trader, it's the DISCIPLINE and SMART APPLICATION of knowledge that makes you one.


Thank you for reading, and have a profitable week ahead! =)

2 comments:

  1. Hi, Did your blog approved from google adsense?

    With referrence to your post, http://www.google.com.tw/support/forum/p/AdSense/thread?tid=6c5caf90193bd6da&hl=en

    I too face similar issue..

    ReplyDelete
  2. Malini,

    I have not tried reapplying for it lately. Will try to do so once my hands are a little more free. =)

    Thanks for dropping by though. Mind leaving me a link to your site?

    Happy to see you here.

    ReplyDelete